The Psychology of Escape

How Intimate Partner Violence Victims Leave Abusive Relationships

Those who have never experienced domestic violence often ask: "Why don't they just leave?" For those who understand the psychology of domestic violence, the question usually becomes: "How do they ever manage to leave at all?"

In celebration of spring, Easter, Passover, Earth Day, and all new beginnings, here’s what we know from the survivors who’ve paved the way.

The Spider Web of Control

Domestic violence crosses all racial, socioeconomic, gender, and religious lines. But why? Why would a financially successful woman stay with someone who hurts her? Why would a soldier who’s seen combat now struggle to leave a partner who belittles and threatens him? The answers lie not in weakness but in the complex psychology of trauma, attachment, and survival mechanisms that operate primarily beneath conscious awareness.

The psychological web of entrapment is multi-layered. Abusers don't merely control victims through physical violence; they reshape how victims see themselves, their options, and even reality itself. Studies show that ongoing psychological abuse actually changes brain activity in areas responsible for making decisions and assessing risk, creating invisible barriers that can be as binding as physical restraints.

Beyond “Trauma Bonds”

One of the most potent forces keeping victims attached to their abusers is what researchers now call "trauma-coerced attachment." This term more accurately describes what's happening than older terms like "trauma bonding," which wrongly suggests a mutual connection between two equals. Trauma-coerced attachment refers to the emotional dependency that develops when an abuser systematically uses specific tactics to manufacture reliance. We’re talking about a deliberately manufactured dependency.

Two key elements create this dependency:

1. Power Imbalance: The abuser establishes control through isolating you from support networks, controlling resources, using intimidation, and other tactics that create deep vulnerability.

2. Unpredictable Rewards and Punishments: The strategic alternation between cruelty and kindness, creating unpredictable cycles of abuse followed by relief or apparent love.

This isn't a natural "bond" but rather a carefully engineered psychological dependency. Research shows this attachment exists on a spectrum, with some victims feeling deeply attached to their abusers while others experience more conflicted feelings. What remains consistent is that this attachment is manufactured through deliberate tactics, not freely chosen by the victim.

The Invisible Cage of Control.

Beyond individual incidents of abuse lies a comprehensive system of control that many abusers establish. This control creates an environment where you become hypervigilant to your abuser's moods, preferences, and potential for violence. This constant alertness drains the mental energy needed to plan an escape, creating a survival-focused mindset that makes it harder to imagine life beyond the relationship.

The damage is tangible and measurable. Domestic violence causes significant psychological and physical harm, decreases quality of life, and in some cases, leads to death. The economic cost to society is in the billions, but the human cost is immeasurable.

The Dissolution of Self: How Abuse Erodes Identity

Perhaps the most insidious aspect of psychological abuse is how it systematically erodes your sense of self. Psychological aggression includes verbal and non-verbal tactics designed to destroy self-worth, inflict emotional harm, and establish control. Over time, this creates a profound barrier to escape—you can't leave if you no longer recognize who you are outside the relationship.

Many survivors describe not leaving earlier because they "no longer knew who they were" apart from their abuser. When your identity has been dismantled piece by piece, imagining independence requires first rebuilding a sense of self, a daunting task when you're in survival mode.

Turning Points: What Finally Makes Escape Possible

What finally propels victims to leave abusive relationships? While each survivor's journey is unique, specific patterns emerge in the stories of those who successfully escaped.

The Tipping Point

Enander and Holmberg's (2021) interviews with survivors revealed that leaving often happens not after a dramatic event but when the accumulated burden of harm reaches a personal threshold. The abuse builds up over time until something inside shifts, and suddenly staying becomes impossible.

This finding explains why some victims leave after seemingly minor incidents that might appear insignificant to outsiders. Emma, a participant in Enander's study, described her turning point: "After years of physical violence, what finally made me leave was when he criticized the dinner I'd made. It wasn't the worst thing he'd done, not by far, but in that moment, I just knew—this would never end unless I ended it."

When Hope Dies

According to Petrosky's (2022) research with domestic violence counselors, hope plays a decisive role in keeping victims attached to abusers—hope that they'll change, that the "good times" will return, that love will triumph. Paradoxically, the death of this hope often becomes the catalyst for escape.

The moment of clarity often comes after specific "hope extinction events" that Thompson and colleagues (2022) documented:

• A final chance given, with clear conditions, that the abuser then violates.

• Promises of change are followed quickly by a return to abuse.

• Discovering hidden betrayals or deceptions.

• Seeing the abuser manipulate others in a way that suddenly illuminates their manipulation pattern.

Sarah, interviewed as part of Thompson's study, explained: "After the third rehab and the third relapse, followed by violence, something clicked. I realized it wasn't that he couldn't change; he wouldn't. That knowledge broke my heart but saved my life."

From Fear to Anger

García-Moreno and colleagues (2023) identified anger as a more powerful motivator for escape than fear. Their longitudinal tracking of emotional responses in abuse victims found that when victims shift from fear to anger toward their abuser, they're significantly more likely to leave successfully.

Rachel, a participant in their study, stated: "For years, terror kept me frozen, always trying to prevent the next explosion. The day I felt fury instead of fear was the day I started packing. I was no longer afraid of what would happen if I left—I was angry about what would happen if I stayed."

García-Moreno explains this pattern: "Fear activates the freeze response and focuses the mind on immediate survival. Anger, however, activates action-oriented brain regions and provides the emotional energy needed for the difficult process of separation."

Seeing the Impact on Others

For victims who are parents, recognizing danger to their children can motivate them to action in a way that their own safety did not. Many parents who tolerated abuse directed at themselves will make a decisive break when they recognize their children are being harmed, either directly or by witnessing the abuse. Children exposed to domestic violence often suffer severe psychological effects that can be long-lasting, including depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, lower self-esteem, and increased risk of self-harm. For many parents, recognizing these symptoms in their child becomes the final push needed to leave.

The Dangerous Decision to Leave: Psychological Barriers to Accurately Assessing Lethal Risk

The question, "Why don't you leave?" oversimplifies the strategic and dangerous complexity of escaping an abusive relationship. Far from a spontaneous act, successful escape typically requires careful planning, precise timing, and navigating multiple obstacles simultaneously.

When someone has previously left and returned to an abusive relationship without being killed or seriously injured, it can be easy to develop a false sense of security: yes, he hurts me, but he wouldn’t kill me.

That’s not what the research says. Dr. Jacquelyn Campbell's research shows that previous separations are actually a risk factor for homicide, not evidence of safety. Understanding the statistical reality—that the risk increases by approximately 75% with each separation attempt—can help victims understand they haven't been "safe." They’ve been lucky.

When I examined ways that trauma therapists use to help their clients get a clearer perspective on their victimization, I discovered techniques that anyone can use:

· Adopt a Third-Person Perspective: Imagine your situation happening to someone you care about. "If your sister told you her husband had done these exact things and was planning to leave him for the fourth time, what would you be worried might happen to her?" This perspective shift often bypasses psychological defenses and allows for more accurate danger assessment.

· Create a Timeline of Your Relationship: Seeing the progression of controlling behaviors, violence, and previous separation attempts can reveal previously unrecognized patterns. When they see graphically how each return was followed by escalating violence or control, the trajectory toward potential lethality becomes clearer.

· Get Some Real Data: Presenting anonymized cases of domestic homicide where the victims expressed the same certainty before being killed has shown remarkable effectiveness in breaking through denial. Exposure to first-person accounts from survivors of near-lethal attacks can be particularly impactful. These testimonies, specifically from survivors who also believed "he would never actually kill me," create powerful identification. Dr. Neil Websdale's domestic fatality review work provides compelling evidence that statements like "He would never actually kill me" were commonly made by victims who were later murdered.

· Understand that Rejection is a Wild Card: Rejection fundamentally changes an abuser’s psychology; even if we knew our abuser before the relationship ended, we sure don’t now. Research by Adams (2007) documented that most domestic homicide perpetrators displayed behaviors and emotional states their victims had never witnessed before during the separation period. Explaining that they literally "don't know" the person their partner becomes when rejected can overcome misplaced confidence.

· Identify Your Concrete Risk Indicators: According to Campbell's Danger Assessment research, 75% of domestic violence homicides occur during the separation process or after the victim has left (Campbell et al., 2018). Teaching victims specific, research-validated lethality risk factors and asking them to check which ones apply to their situation often reveals danger they've overlooked. When victims themselves check these items off a list rather than being told, the realization of danger becomes internal rather than external. Key indicators that predict homicide risk include:

• Access to firearms (increases homicide risk by 500%)

• Previous strangulation attempts (increases risk by 750%)

• Controlling behaviors related to jealousy ("I can't live without you")

• Threats of suicide if abandoned

• Stalking behaviors

• Previous threats to kill

Starting Where You Are

Ask any survivor, and they’ll tell you that they knew the relationship was abusive. People told them to leave. They’ll also tell you that questions encourage self-reflection work better than direct challenges or harsh comments. Questions such as:

• "What's the worst thing your partner has done when angry?"

• "What are you most afraid they might do if you leave?"

• "Have you ever been afraid they might seriously harm or kill you, even for a moment?"

These questions, when asked in a non-judgmental way, often reveal that victims have had moments of accurately assessing lethal risk but have suppressed these insights.

Offering to help create safety plans without requiring a commitment to leaving builds trust and improves risk assessment. The process of planning often reveals dangers that victims may have minimized. Questions like "What would you do if..." followed by escalating scenarios help victims mentally prepare for possibilities they've avoided considering.

In addition to lethality risk indicators, safety planning might include:

· Assessing whether their abuser can track their movements through technology, shared accounts, mutual contacts, or workplace knowledge.

• Evaluating the risk of custody disputes, child abduction by the abuser, or violence directed at children during separation.

• Exploring what available resources would prevent homelessness or destitution, which could force a return to the abuser.

• Reviewing access to any safe friends or family members the abuser doesn't monitor, as isolation increases homicide risk.

• Documenting abuse through medical records, police reports, or private journals, knowing these will be essential for obtaining protective orders.

This careful assessment also explains what outsiders often misinterpret as indecision. Lisa Aronson Fontes, PhD, in her work with abuse survivors, notes: "What looks like passivity to observers is actually a sophisticated survival strategy based on intimate knowledge of the abuser's patterns and triggers".

The Journey Forward: From Victim to Survivor

In this post, I’ve focused on the psychology of escape. But make no mistake; leaving an abusive relationship also involves tangible, practical challenges. It’s also a journey that typically unfolds over time rather than in a single moment of decision. It’s also a journey that continues long after physical escape, as the survivor begins to make sense of what has happened, restores her identity, finds meaning, and forges new relationships.

Yet, extensive interviews with survivors are not stories of weakness. They are stories of remarkable resilience. Dr. Carrie Adams, director of trauma recovery at McLean Hospital, emphasizes: "Recovery from the effects of violence is possible, and with appropriate support, many survivors not only escape abuse but go on to rebuild their lives and form healthy relationships" (McLean Hospital, 2023).

For those still navigating abusive relationships, Stark's (2021) research on successful escapes presents a powerful message: escape is possible even from seemingly inescapable situations. The journey from victim to survivor is neither linear nor straightforward, but it is achievable. In interviews with 204 survivors, Stark found that 87% had made multiple attempts before successfully leaving, but the knowledge and resources gained from each attempt contributed to their eventual freedom.

By understanding the psychological architecture of escape, we gain insight into one of the most challenging human journeys and learn how to support better those still finding their way toward freedom. As Walker and Thompson (2022) concluded in their comprehensive review of recovery trajectories: "The path from entrapment to freedom reveals not just the destructive power of abuse but the extraordinary human capacity for renewal." Here’s to new beginnings.

Resources for Help

If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, help is available:

• National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233 or text START to 88788

• Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

• Love Is Respect (for teens and young adults): 1-866-331-9474 or text LOVEIS to 22522

Remember: You are not alone, it is not your fault, and a different life is possible.

References

Adams, M., Jones, S., & Wilson, T. (2022). Social isolation and domestic homicide risk: A five-year analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9), 1142-1163.

American Psychiatric Association. (2023). Domestic Violence. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/domestic-violence

Bhuller, M., Dahl, G.B., Løken, K.V., & Mogstad, M. (2024). Domestic Violence Reports and the Mental Health and Well-Being of Victims and Their Children. Journal of Human Resources, 59(S), S152-S186.

Campbell, J.C., Webster, D.W., & Glass, N. (2018). The Danger Assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(4), 653-674.

Doychak, K., & Raghavan, C. (2018). "No voice or vote:" trauma-coerced attachment in victims of sex trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 6(3), 339-357.

Enander, V., & Holmberg, C. (2021). "Why doesn't she just leave?": Leaving as a multistage process. Violence Against Women, 27(6), 908-929.

Fontes, L.A. (2020). Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate Relationship. Guilford Press.

Ford-Gilboe, M., Varcoe, C., Wuest, J., Campbell, J., Pajot, M., Heslop, L., & Perrin, N. (2022). Trajectories of depression, post-traumatic stress, and chronic pain among women who have separated from an abusive partner: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15-16), NP13776-NP13803.

García-Moreno, C., Zimmerman, C., & Stöckl, H. (2023). The emotional trajectory of escape: A mixed-methods study of affect in intimate partner violence survivors. Social Science & Medicine, 316, 115509.

Hardesty, J.L., Campbell, J.C., McFarlane, J., & Lewandowski, L.A. (2020). How children and their caregivers adjust after intimate partner femicide. Journal of Family Issues, 41(9), 1693-1718.

Herman, J.L. (2022). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (2nd ed.). Basic Books.

Jefferson, K., & Thompson, R. (2023). Trust after betrayal: Relationship recalibration in survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13-14), 6738-6761.

Khodaei, A., & Rahimi, R. (2023). Domestic Violence against women as victims of violence based on An attachment approach. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 21(3), 116-134.

Kourti, A., Stavrou, P.D., Panaretou, P., Bonotis, K., & Papageorgiou, C.C. (2023). Psychological complications of the children exposed to domestic violence: a systematic review. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 13(1), 19.

Landenburger, K.M. (2020). The dynamics of leaving and recovering from an abusive relationship. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 49(6), 584-596.

Lewis, S.J., & Davidson, L.L. (2023). Identity reconstruction after intimate partner violence: A qualitative longitudinal study. Violence Against Women, 29(3-4), 516-537.

Lund, E.M., Schultz, J.C., Thomas, K.B., Nadorff, M.R., Sias, C.M., Skalisky, J., & Akers, L.A. (2023). The Association between Physical and Psychological Domestic Violence Experienced during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Mental Health Symptoms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3312.

Martinez, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Effective approaches to domestic violence intervention: A meta-analysis of community-based programs. Journal of Social Service Research, 49(2), 244-263.

McLean Hospital. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Domestic Violence. https://www.mcleanhospital.org/essential/domestic-violence

Mental Health Foundation. (2023). Domestic violence: statistics. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/explore-mental-health/statistics/domestic-violence

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Intimate Partner Violence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Petrosky, E. (2022). Hope and its role in domestic violence relationships: A qualitative study with counselors. Family Process, 61(3), 1026-1042.

Richardson, C. (2022). Post-traumatic growth following intimate partner violence: Dimensions, predictors, and outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(4), 1289-1305.

Santiago, R. (2023). From personal to political: Collective healing approaches in intimate partner violence recovery. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(6), 2467-2484.

Spencer, C.M., Stith, S.M., & Cafferky, B. (2021). Risk factors for intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101616.

Stark, E. (2021). Coercive control and exit pathways: A four-country study. Violence Against Women, 27(8), 1139-1159.

Thompson, R.S., Wilson, J.S., & Martin, K.L. (2022). Hope extinction and its role in decisions to leave abusive relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 36(3), 438-449.

Walker, L.E., & Thompson, S.K. (2022). The journey from victim to survivor: Patterns and processes in domestic violence recovery. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 535-551.

Warshaw, C., Sullivan, C.M., & Rivera, E.A. (2022). The paradox of safety: Understanding trauma responses in the aftermath of intimate partner violence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 35(2), 585-597.

Williams, J.R., & Chen, Y. (2021). What helps? A meta-synthesis of support interventions for intimate partner violence survivors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(5), 1156-1174.

World Health Organization. (2023). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women